Files
obikmer/memory/feedback_architectural_decisions.md
Eric Coissac 4736a7b6de refactor: restructure k-mer partitioning pipeline for memory efficiency
Replace in-memory hashing with a disk-backed external merge sort and `PersistentCompactIntVec` to drastically reduce peak RAM. Unify both phases using a custom `PtrHash` MPHF, eliminating `GOFunction` and `boomphf`. Introduce a concrete three-step `count_partition()` pipeline with adaptive chunk sizing based on available system memory. Update dependencies to `memmap2`, `ptr_hash`, and `obicompactvec`. Additionally, document strict genomics-only memory constraints and enforce an architectural feedback workflow requiring explicit user authorization before structural changes.
2026-05-17 16:08:47 +08:00

1.1 KiB

name, description, type
name description type
No architectural decisions without explicit authorization Never make architectural or design decisions without explicit user approval — code decisions are the user's alone feedback

Never make architectural decisions unilaterally. This includes:

  • Memory layout or footprint changes
  • Algorithm or data structure choices (HashSet vs streaming, etc.)
  • Dependency additions or substitutions
  • Structural refactors that go beyond the exact task requested

If a bug or inefficiency is observed, report it and propose alternatives — do not fix it without explicit authorization.

Why: The user optimizes for minimal memory footprint at all times. Introducing a HashSet in count_kmer() (replacing the intended streaming GOFunction construction from the sidecar estimate) caused a serious memory regression that went unreported. This is inadmissible on a project where memory efficiency is a core constraint.

How to apply: When editing code and noticing an architectural issue (even a clear improvement), stop, describe the problem and options, and wait for explicit go-ahead before touching anything.